Current:Home > ScamsTrump sentencing delayed as judge in "hush money" case weighs Supreme Court immunity ruling-InfoLens
Trump sentencing delayed as judge in "hush money" case weighs Supreme Court immunity ruling
View Date:2024-12-23 18:29:42
The judge who presided over Donald Trump's criminal trial in New York agreed on Tuesday to postpone Trump's sentencing hearing until September as he considers a challenge stemming from the Supreme Court's decision on presidential immunity.
Justice Juan Merchan informed Trump's lawyers and Manhattan prosecutors of his decision to delay the July 11 sentencing in response to a pair of letters from the two sides following the Supreme Court's ruling on Monday. The high court found that former presidents enjoy broad immunity for official acts, and said evidence involving those acts cannot be used in prosecutions over unofficial activity.
Hours after the Supreme Court's decision was released, Trump's attorneys asked the court to allow them to file a motion seeking to overturn the verdict in the case by July 10. Prosecutors from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's office said that they were not opposed to delaying sentencing until the issue is resolved, and asked for a deadline of July 24 to respond to the defense's motion.
In a brief response, Merchan approved the proposed schedule and wrote that he'll render a decision on Trump's motion on Sept. 6. He set a new sentencing date of Sept. 18, "if such is still necessary."
On May 30, a unanimous jury found Trump guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records. Prosecutors said Trump in 2017 signed off on an effort to cover up reimbursements for a "hush money" payment to an adult film star as he ran for office in 2016.
Trump's attorneys Todd Blanche and Emil Bove said that their motion will argue that, based on the Supreme Court's decision, prosecutors should not have been allowed to introduce evidence about official acts Trump took while in office.
Trump's letter cited a March 7 pretrial motion in which they asked Merchan to bar certain testimony and evidence, particularly pertaining to Trump's social media posts and public statements while in office that they said were made as official acts.
They said Monday that the "official-acts evidence should never have been put before the jury."
"The verdicts in this case violate the presidential immunity doctrine and create grave risks of 'an Executive Branch that cannibalizes itself,'" they wrote in their letter, quoting the Supreme Court's ruling. The majority ruled that evidence about official acts cannot be introduced "even on charges that purport to be based only on his unofficial conduct."
Prosecutors said in their response that they believe Trump's "arguments to be without merit."
"Although we believe [Trump's] arguments to be without merit, we do not oppose his request for leave to file and his putative request to adjourn sentencing pending determination of his motion," Bragg's team said.
Graham KatesGraham Kates is an investigative reporter covering criminal justice, privacy issues and information security for CBS News Digital. Contact Graham at [email protected] or [email protected]
veryGood! (38)
Related
- Are Dancing with the Stars’ Jenn Tran and Sasha Farber Living Together? She Says…
- Texas jurors are deciding if a student’s parents are liable in a deadly 2018 school shooting
- Spanx Founder Sara Blakely Launches New Product Sneex That Has the Whole Internet Confused
- Paramore recreates iconic Freddie Mercury moment at Eras Tour in Wembley
- Queen Bey and Yale: The Ivy League university is set to offer a course on Beyoncé and her legacy
- Mega Millions winning numbers for August 16 drawing: Jackpot climbs to $498 million
- Car insurance rates could surge by 50% in 3 states: See where they're rising nationwide
- The Bama Rush obsession is real: Inside the phenomena of OOTDs, sorority recruitment
- Jelly Roll goes to jail (for the best reason) ahead of Indianapolis concert
- Springtime Rain Crucial for Getting Wintertime Snowmelt to the Colorado River, Study Finds
Ranking
- Former NFL coach Jack Del Rio charged with operating vehicle while intoxicated
- Save up to 50% on premier cookware this weekend at Sur La Table
- Benefit Cosmetics Just Dropped Its 2024 Holiday Beauty Advent Calendar, Filled with Bestselling Favorites
- Lawyers for plaintiffs in NCAA compensation case unload on opposition to deal
- Utah AD Mark Harlan fined $40,000 for ripping referees and the Big 12 after loss to BYU
- Russian artist released in swap builds a new life in Germany, now free to marry her partner
- Dodgers All-Star Tyler Glasnow lands on IL again
- Sofia Isella opens for Taylor Swift, says she's 'everything you would hope she'd be'
Recommendation
-
'I know how to do math': New Red Lobster CEO says endless shrimp deal is not coming back
-
2.9 billion records, including Social Security numbers, stolen in data hack: What to know
-
Heart disease is rampant in parts of the rural South. Researchers are hitting the road to learn why
-
'Alien: Romulus' movie spoilers! Explosive ending sets up franchise's next steps
-
Tony Hinchcliffe refuses to apologize after calling Puerto Rico 'garbage' at Trump rally
-
When is deadly force justified? Recent police killings raise questions
-
Harris' economic plan promises voters affordable groceries and homes. Don't fall for it.
-
Expect Bears to mirror ups and downs of rookie Caleb Williams – and expect that to be fun